Source reconstruction · Proposed
Gandhi 2.0
An AI reconstruction requested by David Joseph
Question 6 of 6 · Actions
Who does what?
Actions, and what each should achieve.
- Statements
- 24
- Connections
- 8
- Open questions
- 1
How to read it. Read from the bottom up: each action should produce the effect above it.
ActionAlready trueExpected effectandJoint conditions
Action 1 of 8
Choose a host and one function
Proposed role: Proposed host and research lead. Nobody is assigned.
Beyond this part · 2 links
- Select one willing host and one function, and confirm what is already operating. puts into practice A bounded host, problem, affected people, intended outcome and protected conditions are agreed. First steps
- Select one willing host and one function, and confirm what is already operating. puts into practice Existing assets, workflow, available capabilities, dependencies and costs for that case are known. First steps
Action 2 of 8
Check each obstacle at the host
Proposed role: Host representatives and operators. Nobody is assigned.
Draws on the supplied analysis.
Outline
- Expected effectA factual obstacle register exists, with irrelevant barriers removed.From the supplied analysis
- ↑ produces all of these together
- Already trueA bounded case is selected.From the supplied analysis
- ActionCheck each candidate obstacle against the actual workflow, authority, resources and dependencies, and mark each present, absent or unknown.Who: unassigned · proposed role: Host representatives and operatorsFrom the supplied analysis
- ↑ produces all of these together
Beyond this part · 1 link
Action 3 of 8
Agree measures, protections and authority
Proposed role: Participants, facilitator and an independent reviewer. Nobody is assigned.
Draws on the supplied analysis.
Outline
- Expected effectA reviewable bounded trial specification exists, with measures, comparisons, protections and authority arrangements.From the supplied analysis
- ↑ produces all of these together
- Already trueThe current case and affected people are known.From the supplied analysis
- ActionAgree benefit measures, comparisons, protected conditions and the authority and data arrangements.Who: unassigned · proposed role: Participants, facilitator and an independent reviewerFrom the supplied analysis
- ↑ produces all of these together
Beyond this part · 2 links
- Agree benefit measures, comparisons, protected conditions and the authority and data arrangements. puts into practice Baseline, relevant comparison, outcome measures, harm limits and review conditions are agreed. First steps
- Agree benefit measures, comparisons, protected conditions and the authority and data arrangements. puts into practice Decision rights, accountability, confidentiality, human support and data permissions are settled. First steps
Action 4 of 8
Commit resources and check the tool
Proposed role: Host sponsor, facilitator and technical maintainer. Nobody is assigned.
Draws on the supplied analysis.
Outline
- Expected effectPeople, time and resources are committed, and the procedure or tool for the chosen practice is ready.From the supplied analysis
- ↑ produces all of these together
- Already trueThe trial requirements and a potential host are known.From the supplied analysis
- ActionSecure people, time and resources, and check the existing procedure and tool against the workflow.Who: unassigned · proposed role: Host sponsor, facilitator and technical maintainerFrom the supplied analysis
- ↑ produces all of these together
Beyond this part · 4 links
- Secure people, time and resources, and check the existing procedure and tool against the workflow. puts into practice The relevant host has committed accountable people, authority, time, skills and a bounded budget. First steps
- Secure people, time and resources, and check the existing procedure and tool against the workflow. puts into practice A repeatable reflective-inquiry procedure is ready and can challenge the preferred interpretation. First steps
- Secure people, time and resources, and check the existing procedure and tool against the workflow. puts into practice The existing conflict-guidance app fits the workflow, with trained human support and a fallback. First steps
- Secure people, time and resources, and check the existing procedure and tool against the workflow. puts into practice AI voice participation is workable, interruptible and acceptable in the selected real conversation. First steps
Action 5 of 8
Run the bounded comparison
Proposed role: Trial operators and an independent reviewer. Nobody is assigned.
Draws on the supplied analysis.
Outline
- Expected effectTraceable observations exist for the agreed review.From the supplied analysis
- ↑ produces all of these together
- Already trueThe practice is runnable and authorised under explicit limits.From the supplied analysis
- ActionRun the bounded comparison and record benefits, adverse effects, operating costs and actual decision rights.Who: unassigned · proposed role: Trial operators and an independent reviewerFrom the supplied analysis
- ↑ produces all of these together
Beyond this part · 2 links
- Run the bounded comparison and record benefits, harms, operating costs and actual decision rights. puts into practice An authorised bounded trial has produced traceable observations under a credible comparison. First steps
- Run the bounded comparison and record benefits, harms, operating costs and actual decision rights. puts into practice Independent review supports a bounded continuation under the agreed benefit and harm criteria. First steps
Action 6 of 8
Establish continuing operation
Proposed role: Host and service maintainer. Nobody is assigned.
Draws on the supplied analysis.
Beyond this part · 6 links
- Establish continuing operation and, where dependencies matter, test local alternatives and fallback. puts into practice Ordinary operation sustains the benefit, member control and an acceptable continuing cost. First steps
- Establish continuing operation and, where dependencies matter, test local alternatives and fallback. puts into practice AI-assisted functions have explicit quality, cost, energy, data-control and exit requirements. First steps
- Establish continuing operation and, where dependencies matter, test local alternatives and fallback. puts into practice An accessible model, hardware, energy, adaptation rights and a capable maintainer are secured. First steps
- Establish continuing operation and, where dependencies matter, test local alternatives and fallback. puts into practice A local or community-controlled service demonstrably meets the requirements at measured whole cost. First steps
- Establish continuing operation and, where dependencies matter, test local alternatives and fallback. puts into practice Provider loss, migration, operator loss and fallback have been rehearsed within service limits. First steps
- Establish continuing operation and, where dependencies matter, test local alternatives and fallback. puts into practice The community-controlled service remains useful, maintainable and accountable in ordinary operation. First steps
Action 7 of 8
Support an independent site
Proposed role: Originating and receiving groups. Nobody is assigned.
Draws on the supplied analysis.
Beyond this part · 3 links
- Prepare an honest transfer package and support an independent receiving site. puts into practice An honest test package describes the procedure, resources, costs, failures, governance and evidence. First steps
- Prepare an honest transfer package and support an independent receiving site. puts into practice A receiving site has the people, resources and governance to adapt and evaluate the practice. First steps
- Prepare an honest transfer package and support an independent receiving site. puts into practice An independent team reproduces the relevant benefits within its own cost, autonomy and harm limits. First steps
Action 8 of 8
Review success and power separately
Proposed role: Member representatives and independent evaluators. Nobody is assigned.
Draws on the supplied analysis.
Outline
- Expected effectExternal success and internal integrity are tracked separately and acted on.From the supplied analysis
- ↑ produces all of these together
- Already trueMore than one site operates the practice or a shared function.From the supplied analysis
- ActionReview external effectiveness and internal power separately, and revise the practice, governance or scaling decision.Who: unassigned · proposed role: Member representatives and independent evaluatorsFrom the supplied analysis
- ↑ produces all of these together
Beyond this part · 1 link
Where this comes from
In the Logical Thinking Process this view is a transition tree. How a commons works →